Consequences And Effects Of The No Child Left Behind Act

In 2002, the No Child Left Behind act, was made into a law by President Bush. The Act required states to develop assessments in basic skills, and to turn these assessments over to the government to receive funding for their school. This law implemented standardized test that all students needed to take. Many teachers felt that their teaching ability was being based off these test scores. Teachers should not be evaluated on their students performance on exams. The No Child Left Behind act emerged as a result of a massive increase in the costs of schools, while failing to show an improvement in their students performances. (Paterson 32) Since these standardized test have been in effect teachers have been judged off them. The problem is that†¦show more content†¦(Popham 8) Standardized test provide a misrepresentation of how effective a teacher is. (Popham 8) Standardized tests were established to help determine what level a student is on, so they can focus on his or her difficulties and help them become better students. (Popham 9) The way they accomplish this is by comparing each students grade to the national sample of students of the same age and grade level. (Popham 9) These tests are most useful in determining a students strengths and weaknesses, but should not be used to judge the teacher on their effectiveness. (Popham 10) A main issue why you cannot judge a teacher based off their students test scores is because some factors are out of their control. In any classroom across the world there are some students who are smarter than others. (Popham 13) Some can be excellent at math, while others can exceed in science. (Popham 13) A teacher can give over a lesson in a clear and succinct way but there will always be students who do not do well. (Popham 13) Recent thinking among leading educators suggest that there are various forms of intelligence, and a child who is born with less classroom skills may possess other abilities that will not be shown by a test. (Popham 13) For a student as such, a teacher is limited in finding a successful approach to help them gain a high test score. A portion of the standardized test material, is testing what is learned outside of a classroom. (Popham 13)Show MoreRelatedThe Ramifications of Government Reform on Education Essay1354 Words   |  6 Pagesan education in America. However, government acts like No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Common Core curriculums have been put into effect in order to reverse America’s position. They are best understood as tools to bridge the achievement gap regardless of what a child may look like, sound like, or what part of the nation they come from. These programs are designed to help all children excel in school no matter what. Even though the No Child Left Behind Act significantly increased the average performanceRead MoreEssay On No Child Left Behind1333 Words   |  6 PagesHook: â€Å"I used to love teaching,† said Steve Eklund, a retired California teacher. â€Å"Four words drove me into retirement—No Child Left Behind. I could no longer tend to the needs and wants of my students. All I was supposed to do was to get them ready to take tests.† Intro (with thesis): The surviving NCLB mindset of standardized tests being an accurate measure of a students achievement is a problem because it affects our student’s education and increases performance pressure on teachers. WhatRead MoreNclb Political Issues1439 Words   |  6 Pages Political issues involved in No Child Left Behind Performance Task 1 In Partial Fulfillment of AP Seminar Exam Introduction The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was introduced March 22 2001, and enacted January 8th 2002. NCLB was enacted after the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 was determined to be out of date, and underperforming by the majority of US legislatures. The goal of NCLB was to improve the overall success rate of students in The United StatesRead MoreSpecial Education Policy. Morgan Gill. Grand Canyon University.1284 Words   |  6 Pageshad an influential effect on policy in special education. Some of these changes have left a positive legacy for future education legislators to build from while others have been detrimental to a student’s educational success. All having positive and negative outcomes, some of these changes impacting education include the National Institute of Child and Human Development, Education for All Handicapped Children Act, No Child Left Behind Act, and Individuals with Disabilities Act. The reforms listedRead MoreNo Child Left Behind Act80 9 Words   |  3 PagesThe No Child Left behind Act (NCLB) has not had a positive impact on students school age students throughout senior year. â€Å"The Waiver means that schools will not be required to have 100% of students pass the state exams by 2014†. This allows studets o continue on to the next grade level without suffient test scores and compleion. (f the student is not excelling and grasping the information they should not be passed on to the next level . This is how so many developmental delays are missed, the systemRead MoreThe No Child Left Behind Act 2001880 Words   |  4 PagesThe Intent of the No Child Left Behind Act 2001 The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act aim was to ensure all children receive fair and equal access to a high-quality education. It aims was to establish common standards that bridge the achievement gaps between students with disabilities, disadvantaged — high-and-low performing students and ethnic minority, and more advantaged students— non-minority students in reading, math, and science by the year 2014 (Angervil, 2015). It had a strong emphasis on statesRead MoreNo Child Left Behind Act Of 20011019 Words   |  5 PagesNo Child Left Behind- Is It Working Veolia White English 1302 Professor: Sandy Jordan February 27, 2015 The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, signed into law by President Bush on Jan 8, 2002, was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education act, which included Title 1, the government’s flagship aid program for disadvantage students. Many educators were excited about NCLB when it was first signed into law. Test scores were improving. The test scores of minority students have improvedRead MoreThe Importance Of Testing For Children s Learning Essay1473 Words   |  6 Pagesof students’ capacity and then attaches huge consequences to that limited information. Testing used as a diagnostic or summary instrument for children’s learning can be a helpful tool. It is harmful, however, to use students’ test scores as a lever to drive educational improvement. This use of testing is ill-advised because, as described below, it has demonstrably failed to achieve its intended goal, and it has potent negative, unintended consequences. Since NCLB became law in 2002, students mayRead MoreNclb America s Achievement Gap1347 Words   |  6 PagesNCLB America’s Achievement Gap The No Child left Behind Act was intended to close the achievement gap in elementary and secondary schools by allowing each and every student the opportunity to have the best education possible. This law was signed by George W. Bush in 2001 who described it as a law that will, â€Å"Ensure that all children have a fair, equal and significant opportunity to obtain a high quality education†(Neill 2). The No Child Left Behind Act was only intended to help the students, butRead MoreEssay on Is NCLB Necessary?1369 Words   |  6 Pages The No Child Left Behind act is a nationwide legal system that is considered to improve our education system. The NCLB act improves our education system by setting a standard for each school to meet (a required academic standard), hire high quality teachers, improve communication with parents, and provide a safe environment for the students. However after the NCLB act took effect, not much was accomplished. Now many question whether the NCLB is really necessary. The No Child Left Behind’s purpose